Mitsubishi L200 vs BYD Shark
Against the BYD Shark, the Mitsubishi L200 carries 302 kg more.
The Mitsubishi L200 and the BYD Shark side by side, from the manufacturers' own figures: every version THRIVE tracks, with unverified figures left out.
Where each is stronger
The Mitsubishi L200 carries more: up to 1,092 kg of payload, against 790 kg for the BYD Shark. That figure comes from a version plated at 3,200 kg gross vehicle weight, against 3,500 kg, so payload is not like for like.
The Mitsubishi L200 tows more: up to 3,500 kg braked, against 2,500 kg.
Mitsubishi L200 vs BYD Shark: the figures
Best figure across each model's versions; the version pages show which version and the source for every number. The stronger figure is in bold.
| Specification | Mitsubishi L200 | BYD Shark |
|---|---|---|
| Versions we track | 1 | 1 |
| Fuel | diesel | plug-in hybrid |
| Price from (excluding VAT) | £36,295 | - |
| Payload, up to | 1,092 kg | 790 kg |
| Gross vehicle weight | 3,200 kg | 3,500 kg |
| Official fuel economy (diesel/petrol), best | 33.3 mpg | - |
| Plug-in hybrid: official weighted economy | - | 80.7 mpg |
| Plug-in hybrid: electric-only range, up to | - | 55.9 miles |
| Towing (braked), up to | 3,500 kg | 2,500 kg |
| Load length at floor, up to | 1,555 mm | - |
| Load height, up to | 526 mm | - |
| Overall length | 5,320 mm | 5,457 mm |
A plug-in hybrid's official economy is a weighted WLTP result that assumes the van is charged regularly, so it cannot be set against a diesel's combined mpg, and we do not rank it. Real fuel use depends on how often it is plugged in.