Volvo EX30 Cargo vs Citroën ë-C3 Van
The Volvo EX30 Cargo carries 88 kg more and goes 97 miles further on a charge (official figures), while the Citroën ë-C3 Van is £11,446 cheaper to buy.
The Volvo EX30 Cargo and the Citroën ë-C3 Van side by side, from the manufacturers' own figures: electric versions only, so the comparison is like for like, with unverified figures left out.
Where each is stronger
The Citroën ë-C3 Van is the cheaper way in: from £17,550 excluding VAT, against £28,995.83 for the Volvo EX30 Cargo.
The Volvo EX30 Cargo carries more: up to 390 kg of payload, against 302 kg for the Citroën ë-C3 Van. That figure comes from a version plated at 2,240 kg gross vehicle weight, against 1,745 kg, so payload is not like for like.
Electric range favours the Volvo EX30 Cargo: up to 295.2 miles (official), against 198 for the Citroën ë-C3 Van.
The longest load floor is in the Volvo EX30 Cargo: 1,340 mm, against 1,213 mm.
The Volvo EX30 Cargo tows more: up to 1,600 kg braked, against 550 kg.
Volvo EX30 Cargo vs Citroën ë-C3 Van: the figures
Best figure across each model's versions; the version pages show which version and the source for every number. The stronger figure is in bold.
| Specification | Volvo EX30 Cargo | Citroën ë-C3 Van |
|---|---|---|
| Versions we track | 3 | 1 |
| Fuel | electric | electric |
| Price from (excluding VAT) | £28,995.83 | £17,550 |
| Payload, up to | 390 kg | 302 kg |
| Gross vehicle weight | 2,210 kg to 2,335 kg | 1,745 kg |
| Load volume, up to | - | 1.22 m³ |
| Official electric range, up to | 295.2 miles | 198 miles |
| Usable battery, up to | 65 kWh | - |
| DC rapid charging, up to | 153 kW | 100 kW |
| Towing (braked), up to | 1,600 kg | 550 kg |
| Load length at floor, up to | 1,340 mm | 1,213 mm |
| Load height, up to | 623 mm | 935 mm |
| Overall length | 4,233 mm | 4,015 mm |