Nissan Interstar vs Toyota Proace Max
The Nissan Interstar returns 1.5 mpg more on official figures, while the Toyota Proace Max is £153 cheaper to buy, carries 109 kg more, has 2.2 m³ more load space and goes 2 miles further on a charge (official figures).
The Nissan Interstar and the Toyota Proace Max side by side, from the manufacturers' own figures: every version THRIVE tracks, with unverified figures left out.
Where each is stronger
The Toyota Proace Max is the cheaper way in: from £34,836.67 excluding VAT, against £34,990 for the Nissan Interstar.
The Toyota Proace Max carries more: up to 1,475 kg of payload, against 1,366 kg for the Nissan Interstar.
The Toyota Proace Max has the bigger load area: up to 17 m³, against 14.8 m³.
Electric range favours the Toyota Proace Max: up to 260 miles (official), against 258 for the Nissan Interstar.
The longest load floor is in the Toyota Proace Max: 4,070 mm, against 3,855 mm.
On official combined economy (diesel and petrol versions), the Nissan Interstar is better: up to 37.7 mpg, against 36.2 mpg.
Nissan Interstar vs Toyota Proace Max: the figures
Best figure across each model's versions; the version pages show which version and the source for every number. The stronger figure is in bold.
| Specification | Nissan Interstar | Toyota Proace Max |
|---|---|---|
| Versions we track | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel | diesel and electric | diesel and electric |
| Price from (excluding VAT) | £34,990 | £34,836.67 |
| Payload, up to | 1,366 kg | 1,475 kg |
| Gross vehicle weight | 3,500 kg | 3,500 kg to 4,250 kg |
| Load volume, up to | 14.8 m³ | 17 m³ |
| Official electric range, up to | 258 miles | 260 miles |
| Usable battery, up to | - | 97.8 kWh |
| DC rapid charging, up to | 130 kW | 150 kW |
| Official fuel economy (diesel/petrol), best | 37.7 mpg | 36.2 mpg |
| Towing (braked), up to | 2,500 kg | 2,500 kg |
| Load length at floor, up to | 3,855 mm | 4,070 mm |
| Load height, up to | 2,138 mm | - |
| Overall length | 5,780 mm to 6,410 mm | 5,413 mm to 6,363 mm |